Yuku free message boards
Username or E-mail:
Password:
Forgot
Password?
Sign Up
Grab the Yuku app
Search:
RSS
Email
France Fights On
>
APOD - General Discussion
>
POD Proposal – RN Battleship construction - Intro
0 Points
Search this Topic:
Remove this ad
«Prev
1
2
Next»
Jump
Forum Jump
1940 - January
1941 - January
February 1943
January 1942
Mar 44
New Forum
Mowbray's Malaya Forum
TechNaval
Possible Post-1945 APOD Discussions
Announcements
1940 - February
1940 - February
February 1942
January 1943
Jan 44
Tech Mil
1940 - March
191 - March
Index & Time Line
March 1942
March 1943
44 july
Tech Aero
1940
1940 - April
1941-apr
April 1942
April 1943
Feb 44
Tech IndPol
1940 - May
1941-may
May 1942
1940 Year Events and Miscellaneous Topics
May 1943
Apr 44
1941
1940 - June
1941-jun
July 1942
June 1943
May 44
1940-Jul
1941-jul
June 1942
1941 Year Events and Miscellaneous Topics
Dec 43
jun 44
1940 - August
1941-aug
1942 - Chronology
August 1942
Nov 43
1940 - September
1941-sep
September 1942
1942 Year Events, Topics and SINGAPORE
Sept 43
1940 - October
1941-oct
1943 - Chronology
October 1942
Aug 43
1940 - November
1941-Nov
November 1942
1944 Chro
Oct 43
1940 - December
1941-Dec
December 1942
Jly 43
1945
APOD - General Discussion
APOD BARBAROSSA
Technical Papers
APOD Fiction
Naval Losses Annex
Geoff's Shed
Issues
Chronology
The Dugout
B Echelon
Africa & Eurasia
Orders Of Battle
The Good Oil
IJN
Cw Land
USN
MN
KM
RM
China
RN
Gr Land
Jap-Air
USSR
RAFs
Germany
Italy
The Axis
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Re: POD Proposal – RN Battleship construction - Intro
Author
Comment
.
#1
[-]
Posts
: 132
Feb 14 10 4:22 PM
Reply
Quote
More
My Recent Posts
I think as you said, it would depend on the situation.
As mentioned by even Marklbailey, he stated that he though Phillips would have been smart enough to run if knowing that he would be so badly outgunned and outnumbered. So while more Japanese ships would be around later, the British, with additional reinforcements early in 1942 of a couple more carriers, would be in a far stronger position to keep a powerful fleet in being in the Indian Ocean.
Other big issues.
How might Taranto go this time around? In the original version, despite a couple of smaller ships being sunk, the Italian battleships got off about the same as OTL. What to say that another scenario doesn't have one or two more of the battleships knocked out instead. The need for big guns in the Med or Atlantic goes way down.
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Forum Jump
1940 - January
1941 - January
February 1943
January 1942
Mar 44
New Forum
Mowbray's Malaya Forum
TechNaval
Possible Post-1945 APOD Discussions
Announcements
1940 - February
1940 - February
February 1942
January 1943
Jan 44
Tech Mil
1940 - March
191 - March
Index & Time Line
March 1942
March 1943
44 july
Tech Aero
1940
1940 - April
1941-apr
April 1942
April 1943
Feb 44
Tech IndPol
1940 - May
1941-may
May 1942
1940 Year Events and Miscellaneous Topics
May 1943
Apr 44
1941
1940 - June
1941-jun
July 1942
June 1943
May 44
1940-Jul
1941-jul
June 1942
1941 Year Events and Miscellaneous Topics
Dec 43
jun 44
1940 - August
1941-aug
1942 - Chronology
August 1942
Nov 43
1940 - September
1941-sep
September 1942
1942 Year Events, Topics and SINGAPORE
Sept 43
1940 - October
1941-oct
1943 - Chronology
October 1942
Aug 43
1940 - November
1941-Nov
November 1942
1944 Chro
Oct 43
1940 - December
1941-Dec
December 1942
Jly 43
1945
APOD - General Discussion
APOD BARBAROSSA
Technical Papers
APOD Fiction
Naval Losses Annex
Geoff's Shed
Issues
Chronology
The Dugout
B Echelon
Africa & Eurasia
Orders Of Battle
The Good Oil
IJN
Cw Land
USN
MN
KM
RM
China
RN
Gr Land
Jap-Air
USSR
RAFs
Germany
Italy
The Axis
Share This
Email to Friend
del.icio.us
Digg it
Facebook
Blogger
Yahoo MyWeb
«Prev
1
2
Next»
Jump
France Fights On
>
APOD - General Discussion
>
POD Proposal – RN Battleship construction - Intro
Click to subscribe by RSS
Click to receive E-mail notifications of replies